Sunday, April 03, 2005

Pope John Paul II

Somehow, the New York Times had prepared an article about Pope John Paul II where they had the criticisms ready to go... but had trouble tracking down someone to praise him. I'm not kidding. Check out Powerline, and the screen grab they captured of the article. And people wonder why I call it a dishrag.

Just once, I'd like to think that the mainstream media is capable of gracefully covering a story without pandering to its own biases... or at least admitting to those biases upfront.

My own admittedly insufficient comments about this great man can be found here. A reasonable liberal perspective on the Pope can be found here. Personally, I like Charles Krauthammer's words...

I am not much of a believer, but I find it hard not to suspect some providential hand at play when the white smoke went up at the Vatican 27 years ago and the Polish cardinal was chosen to lead the Catholic Church. Precisely at the moment the West most desperately needed it, we were sent a champion. It is hard to remember now how dark those days were. The 15 months following the pope's elevation marked the high tide of Soviet communism and the nadir of the free world's post-Vietnam collapse.

It was a time of one defeat after another. Vietnam invaded Cambodia, consolidating Soviet hegemony over all of Indochina. The Khomeni revolution swept away America's strategic anchor in the Middle East. Nicaragua fell to the Sandinistas, the first Soviet-allied regime on the mainland of the Western Hemisphere. (As an unnoticed but ironic coda, Marxists came to power in Grenada too.) Then finally, the Soviets invaded Afghanistan.

And yet precisely at the time of this free-world retreat and disarray, a miracle happens. The Catholic Church, breaking nearly 500 years of tradition, puts itself in the hands of an obscure non-Italian -- a Pole who, deeply understanding the East European predicament, rose to become, along with Roosevelt, Churchill and Reagan, one of the great liberators of the 20th century.

John Paul II's first great mission was to reclaim his native Eastern Europe for civilization. It began with his visit to Poland in 1979, symbolizing and embodying a spiritual humanism that was the antithesis of the soulless materialism and decay of late Marxist-Leninism. As millions gathered to hear him and worship with him, they began to feel their own power and to find the institutional structure -- the vibrant Polish church -- around which to mobilize.

And mobilize they did. It is no accident that Solidarity, the leading edge of the East European revolution, was born just a year after the pope's first visit. Deploying a brilliantly subtle diplomacy that never openly challenged the Soviet system but nurtured and justified every oppositional trend, often within the bosom of the local church, John Paul II became the pivotal figure of the people power revolutions of Eastern Europe.
This man loved freedom, loved peace, and loved the poor. Could he have done a better job as a leader for the Chruch? Yes. But this only proves that he was human -- when we weigh his contributions to humanity against his errors, we find a man whose example we would all do well to follow.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home