I Guess I'm Not Doing It For Money
According to this, my blog is worth a little less than $1,700. I guess I'm not retiring anytime soon.
On the plus side, my readers are getting this for free. Of course, you get what you pay for.
Latest Thoughts, Insights, and General Brilliance (or not) from the World's Least Dangerous Men
According to this, my blog is worth a little less than $1,700. I guess I'm not retiring anytime soon.
Over at VodkaPundit, Stephen Green analyzes the War on Terror, provides some historical perspective, and tells us where he believes this war will ultimately be won. This is the type of analysis we need, and the concluding paragraphs really nail the mainstream media (MSM) to the wall...
It's fair to ask if the Iraq Campaign was a necessary component to the Terror War. It isn't fair to compare Iraq to Vietnam, when the two wars have nothing, zero, nada in common. It's fair to ask if our soldier are dying in vain, or because of stupid policy, or because of inferior equipment. It's not fair to run headlines like "Battle Deaths Continue to Mount." No shit, Sherlock? A real story would be, "Battle Deaths Decline as Fallen Soldiers Miraculously Resurrected." It's fair to question Bush's policies. It's not fair to act as a conduit for enemy propaganda. It's fair to ask if Iraq is draining resources from our efforts in Afghanistan. It's not fair to complain that Afghanistan isn't perfect yet. It's fair to complain about indecencies at Abu Ghraib. It's not fair to virtually ignore atrocities committed by the other side everywhere else in Iraq.Green is essentially right on so many counts that's it's disturbing. I can't and won't argue that the Administration has done a great job fighting the Iraq War. But I also think that the criticism it has received from many quarters comes from those who would rather wound the President's political interests than assist us in winning in Iraq. Destructive criticism seems to be the order of the day as much as constructive criticism, particularly from the left.
But our media, aware of their power but ignorant as to its uses, would rather play "gotcha" than provide critical perspective.
Germany lost WWI because they couldn't match our manpower. They lost again in 1945, because they couldn't match Allied productive might. We could very well lose this war, because our leadership has so far failed to recognize the power of the media. We might also lose because our enemies are oftentimes more media-savvy than we are. We could lose also because our mainstream media seems to find terrorists less unattractive than having a conservative Texan in the White House.
There is no "fixing" the American mainstream media, unless change comes organically. When I wrote last year that we can't win this war by giving up our freedoms, I wasn't kidding – without a free press, we're doomed.
But I do mean to serve notice to the MSM.
When a nation loses a war, it looks to punish the people it believes are to blame. After Vietnam, neither Washington nor our Armed Forces were ever the same again. But if we lose this Terror War, our media will be seen as largely to blame. They'll suffer blame for their ignorance and for their petulance. They'll suffer blame for seeing al Jazeera as comrades closer than the privates and NCOs and officers fighting to protect the First Amendment. They'll suffer blame for putting their hatred of a Republican President before their love of country. Whether that assessment is fair or not, it is how the public will see things.
Then the public would demand changes. And they'd probably get them, courtesy of a government looking for scapegoats, real or imagined. Should that day come, we'd lose our free press, and we'd lose our freedoms. We'd lose our country.
I don't mean to imply that the MSM needs to hop on board the bandwagon and cheerlead for any President along any military campaign, no matter how foolhardy – far from it. In case you hadn't noticed, I used a good portion of this essay to complain about Washington, and that's something the media can do a whole lot more effectively than one small blogger. Criticism isn't just necessary, it's a necessary good. But the MSM needs to relearn constructive criticism, and they need to remember which country defends their rights, and which group of people would gleefully slit their throats.
Today, the arm of decision is the media, and it's impossible to predict what new power will someday eclipse it. But if our media companies lose their First Amendment freedoms in a populist spasm of government power, they'll have only themselves to blame.
The media have the power. They wield the arm of decision. Even if only for our own sakes, let's hope they learn to use it with more wisdom and foresight than they have these last four years.
Never, ever bring up a woman's weight with her...
Hollywood actress Kate Hudson, star of "The Skeleton Key," instructed lawyers to begin action on Monday against several publications for printing pictures which she said falsely implied she had an eating disorder.This is the difference between Hollywood and the rest of America. Most women in America worry that someone's going to take a picture that makes them look fat, while in Hollywood, they worry about pictures making them look too thin.
Hudson, daughter of actress Goldie Hawn, claims the pictures "suggested that she had an eating disorder that was so grave and serious that she was wasting away, to the extreme concern of her mother and family," her lawyers said.
The images, and the articles that accompanied them, could also prove damaging to her career as it might raise concern amongst casting agents, London law firm Schillings added.
The publications included U.S. tabloid The National Enquirer for its article last month titled "Goldie tells Kate: Eat Something! And She Listens!"
Yes, I was taking a little time off to advise the President on righting the ship of state.