Thursday, November 11, 2010

They're Definitely More Damaged Right Now

Hey, I didn't say it...

"The big shows with mass appeal tend to have above-average scores from Democrats and Republicans but with higher concentrations of Republicans," says John Fetto, senior marketing manager at Experian Simmons. "Looking at the Democrats' side, I don't mean to make light of it, but they seem to like shows about damaged people. Those are the kind of shows Republicans just stay away from."
I can't say I'm really shocked by either list -- the GOP list of top shows reads like the stuff at the top of the ratings, while the stuff at the top of the Democrats' list is generally critically acclaimed (often by critics who are Democrats). I don't know that either list is better than the other -- people have different tastes. However, some of the choices on the Dem list show an appalling lack of taste; Kourtney and Khloe Take Miami and the new 90210 may not exist for any reason other than to make people more stupid.  To be fair and balanced, I have no earthly clue why anyone would watch "The Bachelor" (which is somehow popular among Republicans) other than for the opportunity to mock the people on the show.

Labels:

Whose Nuts?

Loyal reader ST sends along this story about a cricket who won't be named Jiminy...

A species of cricket has broken an unlikely world record: largest testicles in relation to body weight.


The tuberous bushcricket's testicles account for 14 percent of its body weight. To put that in perspective, the testicles of a man weighing 200 pounds (91 kilograms) with that ball-to-body ratio would weigh 28 pounds (12.7 kilograms).


The bushcricket, whose anatomical extremes were reported Tuesday in the journal Biology Letters, edges out the record of a species of fruit fly, Drosophila bifurca, whose testes-to-body weight ratio has been recorded as 10.6 percent.
The ball-to-body ratio might be the only stat the NFL doesn't measure at its scouting combine. I'll leave the rest of the available jokes to all three of my readers.

Labels: ,

The Slow Death Of The Dishrag

Dana Loesch notes that even the New York Times editors think paying for delivery of the dead tree version of the left-wing dishrag is dumb (hat tip: Instapundit).  It's been at least a decade since I paid for home delivery of a newspaper, and other than the occassional purchase in an airport on travel, I might have bought a newspaper twice in the last eight years.  Outside of habit, I'm not sure why people still get delivery.  As to the dish-rag, I might need to start referring to it as something other than a dishrag whenever it goes all digital.

Labels: ,

Defending Liberal Stupidity

I give this Josh Ozersky credit for defending an unpopular position, stating that San Francisco's Happy meal ban doesn't go far enough.  Unfortunately, his argument still isn't very convincing...

Again and again, efforts to promote fresh fruit and produce in low-income urban areas have failed for the simple reason that Americans have been brainwashed. We have been conditioned, starting in utero, to prefer high-fat, high-salt, high-sugar concoctions rather than their less exciting, more natural culinary cousins. One of my favorite recent examples of American food stubbornness occurred this spring when British food personality Jamie Oliver, seeking to teach the children of West Virginia to despise chicken nuggets, showed them how horrible the process of making them was. After producing a nasty pink paste of ground bone and tendons and skin, which he then shaped, breaded and fried, he asked who would still eat the finished product. Every little hand shot up.
Why? Because as Americans, we like highly processed food. It was invented to please us. Cheap flavor bombs will always trump healthier alternatives. Dangling a Transformer or Beanie Baby or some other toy du jour in front of a kid may help balance the playing field at least a little. But why can't cheap, processed food be made healthier? Is that really impossible? Or is it just too expensive? And why are eight people in San Francisco the only ones who seem willing to step up and do something unpopular to address such a serious issue?
What I love about these arguments for banning unhealthy food tend to come from people who would probably be open to the idea of drug legalization.

That point aside... I will acknowledge for the sake of argument that processed food probably makes Americans fat, and processed food is almost certainly is more tempting to us than non-processed healthier alternatives. But sugar is more tempting to me than cabbage -- should we ban sugar as well?

The reason these bans are unpopular is that people don't want government taking their freedom in the name of knowing what's better for them. If people want healthier choices, a market will develop for those choices -- and it has developed, and no, that food won't be cheaper. For example, it costs a hell of a lot more to get organic food.  And yes, people will probably choose the less healthy alternative, because it's cheaper and because it tastes better.  But that's a choice they make, and will probably continue to make, no matter how many dumb rules you put in the way.  Some people choose to eat a cheeseburger in full knowledge of the fact that it's unhealthy, because they figure life is short and they want to enjoy it.  Others do so because it's cheaper and they want to afford a big-screen TV or a bigger apartment.  These may be foolish choices, but they're foolish choices that we are allowed to make.

And let's stop with the "won't somebody please think of the children" argument.  I have a three year old who throws tantrums and cries for stuff she wants, but it's up to me (or her mother) to say no.  It's hard, I know, but people are capable of exercising thier own judgement.  And they make foolish choices, even for their kids.  But they are their choices to make. 

Labels:

The Health Care Follies Continue

Jesse Jackson refers to the potential repeal of health care reform as a "creeping genocide."



I'm expecting everyone who got offended by Sarah Palin's death panels reference to jump up and yell at Jesse. By the way, as Allahpundit points out, health care reform won't fully kick in until 2014. Are we experiencing the creeping genocide right now?

Labels: ,

Last Dance With Mary Jane

Just a tip -- you're much more likely to be needing the drugs for the next 18 years than you did during labor...

Police say a new father faces drug charges because he lit up a marijuana joint while waiting for his wife to give birth at a western Pennsylvania hospital.

...Uniontown police Sgt. Jonathan Grabiak tells the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review that a nurse smelled the marijuana when she took a cigarette break in the same area, and a hospital security guard called police about 3:20 a.m.

Grabiak says the man told him, "I'm having a baby and wanted to get a buzz" and then pulled a bag of marijuana from his shoe.
Dude, you're in a hospital. How hard would it have been to argue that it was medicinal?

Labels: ,

Tuesday, November 09, 2010

And Just Think, He Could Have Been A Senator

It's not often I agree with Josh Marshall, but I think his guesses on Charlie Crist's political future are pretty good.  Heck, they may be the best case scenarios for Crist.

Meanwhile, I want to know who wastes their time trying to get Jim Morrison a pardon.  Is unemployment that bad?

Labels: ,

He Gives Socialists A Bad Name

I know people were mocking Sharron Angle and Christine O'Donnell and claiming they weren't smart enough to join the Senate.  Can those same people weigh in on the stupidity of Sen. Bernie Sanders?  Because he's looking to block the NBC-Comcast merger because we can't have Republicans running major media companies

The great thing about the U.S. Senate is that this probably won't be the dumbest thing said by a Senator this week.

Labels: ,

Apparently, It Takes Awhile To Count Votes From The Dead

Among the GOP's wins last Tuesday was the Senate seat that once belonged to Barack Obama back when he was an inexperienced junior Senator, lo so many years ago.  Wait... it was only two years ago?

Seriously, the election in Illinois was actually two elections -- one to fill the remaining month-plus of Obama's term (ineptly manned by Roland Burris for the past 21 months or so) and then to take his Senate seat permenently.  This meant the winner would be able to serve immediately in the upcoming lame-duck situation... or would have been, if Illinois could certify its resuts.

Best part is that this means the state government is either irredeemably corrupt, or incompetent.  Or more likely both.

Labels: ,

Yeah, I Don't Think They Get It

The GOP won't throw a party to celebrate winning back control of the House because of a recession and 9.6% unemployment, but Nancy Pelosi is throwing a party to celebrate the "accomplishments" of the 11th Congress.

Seriously, how did the GOP ever lose to a group this myopically stupid?

Labels: ,

Monday, November 08, 2010

What Annoying Song Is Stuck In My Head Today?

If I need to suffer with a song stuck in my head, why shouldn't you have to do the same? Sometimes they're good, most times they're bad... but no matter what, they make you suffer. So I like to share the suffering whenever it happens.

This is from back when Bret Michaels was famous for making music, and back whent he rest of the band's face had not melted.  Okay, I'm kidding about the last one, but rock legends tend to age badly.  And the song itself... well, it was always pretty annoying.



You're welcome.

Labels: ,

The Thrill Is Gone

It's such a shame when relationships grow stale.  But it was bound to happen after so many years of married bliss.... wait, he's only been President for two years?  Well, we know 50% of marriages end in divorce...
He came across as a young man in a grown-up's game—impressive but not presidential. A politician but not a leader, managing American policy at home and American power abroad with disturbing amateurishness. Indeed, there was a growing perception of the inability to run the machinery of government and to find the right people to manage it. A man who was once seen as a talented and even charismatic rhetorician is now seen as lacking real experience or even the ability to stop America's decline. "Yes we can," he once said, but now America asks, "Can he?"


The last two years have exposed to the public the risk that came with voting an inexperienced politician into office at a time when there was a crisis in America's economy, as the nation contended with a financial freeze, a painful recession, and two wars. The Democrats were simply not aggressive enough or focused enough in confronting the profound economic crisis represented by millions of ordinary Americans whose main concern was the lack of jobs.


Jobs have long represented the stairway to upward mobility in America, and the anxiety over joblessness became the dominant concern at a time when financial security based on home equity and pensions was dramatically eroding. No great speech is going to change the fundamental fact that millions of people are either jobless or underemployed at a time when only a quarter of the American population describes the job market as good.
Zuckerman is a liberal, so he's forgiven for buying the BS that was sold in 2008.  But he isn't the only one who's feeling a bit pained, as erstwhile conservatives who once admired this President are now coming down on him like a load of bricks. Peggy Noonan eviscerates the President...
On Wednesday, President Obama gave a news conference to share his thoughts. Viewers would have found it disappointing if there had been any viewers. The president is speaking, in effect, to an empty room. From my notes five minutes in: "This wet blanket, this occupier of the least interesting corner of the faculty lounge, this joy-free zone, this inert gas." By the end I was certain he will never produce a successful stimulus because he is a human depression.


Actually I thought the worst thing you can say about a president: He won't even make a good former president.


His detachment is so great, it is even from himself. As he spoke, he seemed to be narrating from a remove. It was like hearing the audiobook of Volume I of his presidential memoirs. "Obama was frustrated. He honestly didn't understand what the country was doing. It was as if they had compulsive hand-washing disorder. In '08 they washed off Bush. Now they're washing off Obama. There he is, swirling down the drain! It's all too dramatic, too polar. The morning after the election it occurred to him: maybe he should take strong action. Maybe he should fire America! They did well in 2008, but since then they've been slipping. They weren't giving him the followership he needed. But that wouldn't work, they'd only complain. He had to keep his cool. His aides kept telling him, 'Show humility.' But they never told him what humility looked like. What was he supposed to do, burst into tears and say hit me? Not knowing how to feel humility or therefore show humility he decided to announce humility: He found the election 'humbling,' he said."
Thanks, Peggy. To quote Adam Sandler in The Wedding Singer, "Once again, things that could've been brought to my attention YESTERDAY!" In fact Noonan does a nice job warning the Tea Party and its GOP adherents about the dangers of candidates whom the broader electorate might view as unqualified, with a big arrow pointing to Sarah Palin.

Well, where the hell was that warning in 2008?

Listen, on the issue of Sarah Palin, there are all sorts of issues related to her and 2012 and whether she should be the GOP nominee or not.  But going back to 2008, I'm still appalled by people who believed that Obama was qualified and able to handle the job of President, yet were distressed by the prospect that Palin might someday ascend to the job were something to happen to John McCain.

I think it's perfectly reasonable to conclude that Obama might have the chops to handle the job, but I would have enjoyed someone providing some evidence to back up that conclusion.  Recall that part of the case for excusing his lack of executive experience was the inane claim that he was doing a fine job helming a Presidential campaign.  Yes, I know he graduated from Harvard Law School (based on the author of this blog, that's not exactly an impressive achievement), was a community organizer (so are Boy Scouts), state Senator (good prep work for Illinois politics), and served in the U.S. Senate for less than one term.  But no one worried that the guy they were electing to the office of President had arguably the same level of experience and qualifications (if not less) than the VP candidate on the other ticket that everyone derided.  Hell, part of the reason Joe Biden was viewed as a good pick for the ticket was that he lent the ticket gravitas.  What does it say when you're bringing Joe Biden in to impress people that you're up to a job?

No, the real reason President Obama passed the test with Washington's elite is that he was one of them, whereas Palin was not.  He backed that up with much of the rest of America by giving pretty speeches and coming along at the right time.  And now we're paying the price for treating the 2008 Presidential election with the same level of careful examination as high school kids do when picking a yearbook editor.

By the way, on Noonan's last point... I don't watch Mad Men, despite hearty recommondations that I do so from people I trust.  But I think I understand what Instapundit and others are saying when they refer to this as the "Don Draper Presidency."  I'm just wondering how this show will end.

Labels: , , , ,

Yes, But Will They Listen?

Frank Luntz accurately summarizes the electorate's mood following the midterm elections...
First, a warning to both sides. Republicans, for their part, must realize that the voters have given them a reprieve, not an endorsement. In my polling last week, GOP voters agreed with this statement by more than two to one: "I am willing to give the Republicans another chance, but if they mess up again, I'll vote them out again, too." That's hardly a cause for GOP celebration.


Similarly, Democrats must grasp that their defeats were not about deficient personalities or insufficient communication, but about their philosophy and substance. Roughly two out of three voters agreed with the statements that President Obama "has failed to deliver hope and change" and that in the midst of an economic crisis, Democrats "had their priorities wrong."


The post-midterm realities are simple: If the Republicans don't deliver on their promises, they're finished. If the Democrats continue doing what they're doing, they're finished.
Of course, this being Washinton, it's likely both parties ignore the warnings. The Democrats have already given off signs that they think the election was merely a referendum on the economy and/or the result of poor messaging by them. The GOP thus far is at least making the right noises, but they're capable of forgetting why they were sent to D.C. Hopefully, the Tea Party continues to hold their feet to the fire.

Labels:

Sunday, November 07, 2010

Random Things That Annoy Me

Because life is full of annoying crap, and this is my place to complain about it.
A request to all of you folks who stand in front of me at an ATM machine, contemplating the meaning of life or whatever it is you do when you're staring at the screen.  Stop, and finish your friggin' transaction.

Seriously, it's not that tough to actually withdraw money, deposit a check, buy stamps, whatever.  You have to remember a pin, enter it, and then click buttons on a screen.  Yet I'll watch people who seem mystified by the entire process, like they're trying to understand the health care bill.

And while I'm at it, on behalf of the entire contingent of people from Southeastern PA, why did "ATM" win out as the appropriate abbreviation?  Why didn't anyone else pick up on calling it a MAC (Money Access Center)?  We used to smack MAC for cash.  Now if you say that, people think you're shaking down Irish people. 

Labels:

What Annoying Song Is Stuck In My Head Today?

If I need to suffer with a song stuck in my head, why shouldn't you have to do the same? Sometimes they're good, most times they're bad... but no matter what, they make you suffer. So I like to share the suffering whenever it happens.

Easily one of the more depressing tunes on my Ipod, and pretty hauntingly beautiful.  Yeah, just call me your Saturday night buzzkill.



You're welcome.

Labels: ,

We Were The Underpants Gnomes We Were Waiting For

Megan McArdle comes up with my favorite theory for describing the Democrats' ill-fated decision to pass nationalized health care and why they believed it wouldn't hurt them at the polls...

How much did health care matter in Tuesday's results?  A lot, argues Eric McGhee; in fact, it may have helped cost Democrats control of the House...

I'm still sort of awed that Democrats managed to convince themselves otherwise.  It was the Underpants Gnome theory of politics:

1.  Pass huge, unpopular bill
2.  ???
3.  Bounce in the polls

None of the arguments ever made any sense, and at the time, I assumed that the people advancing them were simply spinning for the media.  But as time wore on, it became clear that at least some of them actually believed it, including people who voted yes on the bill and then went to their doom. 
Those who seem to think that the election was decided simply by the poor state of the economy are ignoring reality.  The 60+ seat wipeout in the House represents more than just voter frustration with poor economic performance.  It also represents voter anger and discontent with a Congress that ignored thier wishes and pissed on their constiuents by passing a huge new health care entitlement.

It's important to note that Democrats still seem hell-bent on defending the bill, but they almost always fall back on defending the "popular provisions" of the bill, such as the ban on pre-existing conditions and the ability of parents to keep their kids on their insurance until they are 26.  They cannot defend the rest of the legislation amongst mixed company, because when they try, they get challenged on less-than-credible claims like the assertion that the bill will trim the budget deficit.  I don't even think many Democrats believes that claim. 

Mickey Kaus makes the related point that the sales pitch for health care was one guaranteed to lose senior votes, because of the realistic concern about death panels.  This may provide some comfort to Dems who truly believe that the problem with health care was the "messaging" and also have them arguing that Obama and Co. cost themselves votes by being honest in selling the program.  This would ignore two basic points: 

1.  If messaging was the problem, then the bill really would have become more popular after passage (it has not) and Pelosi's stupid claim that they had to pass the bill so we could find out what was in it might actually make some sense.

2.  Any honesty in the claims made about the health care bill is effectively offset by the Dems' gaming of the CBO score and the procedural shenanigans they engaged in to pass the bill.

So where does that leave us?  Well, back to the gnomes...




Labels: , , , ,